MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130381696 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2006.041

The Bend Justifies the Leans: Interpreting Recumbent Ichnofabrics

2006· article· en· W2130381696 on OpenAlexaffabout
Murray K. Gingras, Kerrie L. Bann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsAlberta EnergyBP (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsGeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract En echelon, bent burrow fabrics are commonly interpreted as an ethological response to high population densities or for filter feeding in conditions influenced by a dominant current direction. However, systematically bent burrows are more likely the result of simple shear on inclined depositional surfaces. A modern example of bent burrows is drawn from tidally influenced point bars situated near the mouth of the Shepody River Estuary, Canada. There the deposits are composed of interbedded silty mud and rare sandy mud beds that dip channelwards. The dipping bedsets are referred to as inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS). Throughout much of the area, the upper 5 to 20 cm of the substrate is unconsolidated and is "soft" to locally fluid. The fine sediment resists resuspension by the tidally generated currents, but it flows (plastically) down depositional slopes. Tension gashes, minor mud flows, and deformed biogenic sedimentary structures attest to consistent downslope shearing of the sedimentary substrate. Below the zone of mobile mud, the sediment is comparatively cohesive (firm). The change in cohesiveness is abrupt. Particularly at the "soft to firm" transition, sediment tends to creep downslope, straining the sedimentary fabric. Burrows that descend through the soft sediment into the comparatively firm substrate are noticeably bent at that contact. Burrows are predictably deformed due to down-slope sediment creep—i.e., they are deformed such that the basal part of the burrows point up dip, indicating downslope movement of the upper mobile layer. Burrow fabrics within the older, firm sediment (i.e., in the historical layers) are generally highly strained. Scrutiny of the modern and historical biogenic fabrics shows that: (1) active infauna display a preference to construct dwellings that are oriented perpendicular to bedding planes; (2) the presence of pristine, undeformed burrows in the active layers contrasts with pervasive deformation observed in the historical layers; (3) the temporal nature of the sediment creep occurs at a slower rate than the animal's ability to maintain the burrow structure, thus the strained burrows observed in the historical deposits were deformed after burrow abandonment; (4) the magnitude of strain varies between 1.5 and 2.1 to 1; (5) strains that exceed 2 to 1 essentially eradicate the biogenic fabric and represent a potential upper limit for the preservation of ichnofossils under similar conditions; (6) the recumbent-appearing ichnofossil assemblage in the historical layers does not specifically indicate a response to population dynamics or a preferred current direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207