Postnatal development has a marked effect on ventricular repolarization in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To better understand the mechanisms that underlie cardiac repolarization abnormalities in the immature heart, this study characterized and compared K(+) currents in mouse ventricular myocytes from day 1, day 7, day 20, and adult CD1 mice to determine the effects of postnatal development on ventricular repolarization. Current- and patch-clamp techniques were used to examine action potentials and the K(+) currents underlying repolarization in isolated myocytes. RT-PCR was used to quantify mRNA expression for the K(+) channels of interest. This study found that action potential duration (APD) decreased as age increased, with the shortest APDs observed in adult myocytes. This study also showed that K(+) currents and the mRNA relative abundance for the various K(+) channels were significantly greater in adult myocytes compared with day 1 myocytes. Examination of the individual components of total K(+) current revealed that the inward rectifier K(+) current (I(K1)) developed by day 7, both the Ca(2+)-independent transient outward current (I(to)) and the steady-state outward K(+) current (I(ss)) developed by day 20, and the ultrarapid delayed rectifier K(+) current (I(Kur)) did not fully develop until the mouse reached maturity. Interestingly, the increase in I(Kur) was not associated with a decrease in APD. Comparison of atrial and ventricular K(+) currents showed that I(to) and I(Kur) density were significantly greater in day 7, day 20, and adult myocytes compared with age-matched atrial cells. Overall, it appears that, in mouse ventricle, developmental changes in APD are likely attributable to increases in I(to), I(ss), and I(K1), whereas the role of I(Kur) during postnatal development appears to be less critical to APD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".