MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130418222 · doi:10.2174/187231208784040915

Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of Diltiazem Following Multiple Doses:Comparing Normotensive Rat vs. Hypertensive Rat Models In vivo

2008· article· en· W2130418222 on OpenAlexaff
Pollen Yeung, Angelita Alcos, Jinglan Tang, William L. Casley

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Metabolism Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiltiazemPharmacokineticsPharmacologyIn vivoMetabolismChemistryDrugDrug interactionDrug metabolismMedicineCalciumEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to identify a suitable rodent model for preclinical study of calcium antagonists, pharmacokinetics and metabolism of diltiazem (DTZ) were compared in normotensive SD and hypertensive SHR rat models following multiple doses (5 mg/kg twice daily for 5 doses). Plasma concentrations of DTZ and its major metabolites appeared to be higher in the SHR than the SD rats, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The preliminary results suggest metabolism profile of DTZ in the SHR may be closer to humans than the SD rats and may be more preferred in pre-clinical drug development studies for DTZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Metabolism LettersSame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207