Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phase relations in the dry condensed system Cu–Rh–S were determined at 900, 700, 540 and 500°C. At 900°C, the system contains digenite, four rhodium sulfides (Rh 17 S 15 , Rh 3 S 4 , Rh 2 S 3 and RhS ~3 ), three ternary sulfides (CuRh 2 S 4 , Cu x RhS 3+ x and a fibrous sulfide in the range Cu 11.9 Rh 24.6 S 63.6 – Cu 20.4 Rh 19.8 S 59.7 ), Cu–S sulfide melt, and Cu–Rh alloys. At 700°C, the ternary association changes to CuRh 2 S 4 , CuRhS 3 , and CuRhS 4 . All these phases persist with little change at 540°C. At 500°C, CuS appears, and the number of phases is reduced; only CuRhS 4 persists as a ternary phase. Ranges of solid solution for Cu–Rh alloys drop drastically with temperature. The solubility of Cu in Rh sulfides increases moderately as temperature decreases from 900° to 540°C. The solubility of Rh in digenite and Cu–S melt is very limited at all temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".