MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130448148 · doi:10.5539/mas.v5n2p143

Experimental Study on a Model of Bulk Wind Energy Collecting System

2011· article· en· W2130448148 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhongjian Sun, Zhibo Tang Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerTurbineWind speedWork (physics)Energy (signal processing)Environmental scienceElectricityMarine engineeringAltitude (triangle)Computer sciencePower (physics)MeteorologyWind directionEnergy systemAerospace engineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a vertical axis wind energy collecting system and bulk wind energy collecting system. This system may be integrated with the urban high buildings, and produce the electricity by the means of collecting high-altitude wind energy. We design a model and do series of experiments on the model and get some results. Results show that power output reaches a maximum when the angle is 45°, turbine starts to work at the wind speed of 1.8m/s. We find that it has a strong ability to adapt to random direction and low speed wind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207