Distinct chaperone mechanisms can delay the formation of aggresomes by the myopathy-causing R120G B-crystallin mutant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A familial form of desmin-related myopathy (DRM) is associated with a missense mutation (R120G) in alphaB-crystallin (alphaB) and is characterized by intracellular desmin aggregation. Because alphaB is a molecular chaperone that participates in the assembly of desmin filaments, it has been suggested that the desmin aggregation might be due to the loss of alphaB function. We report here that alphaBR120G has indeed impaired in vivo function and structure as reflected by a highly reduced capacity to protect cells against heat shock and by an abnormal supramolecular organization even in cells not expressing desmin. In many cells, alphaBR120G accumulated in inclusion bodies that had characteristics of aggresomes concentrating around the centrosome following a microtubule-facilitated process. Three distinct chaperone mechanisms could reduce or even prevent the formation of the alphaBR120G aggresomes. Wild-type alphaB and Hsp27 prevented aggresome formation by co-oligomerizing with alphaBR120G. Hsp70 with its co-chaperone Hdj-1 or Chip-1 but not a mutant of Chip-1 lacking ubiquitin ligase activity, reduced the frequency of aggresome formation likely by targeting alphaBR120G for degradation. Finally, HspB8 interacted only transiently with alphaB but nonetheless rescued the alphaBR120G oligomeric organization, suggesting that it acted as a true chaperone assisting in the folding of the mutant protein. Hence, the formation of inclusion bodies in alphaBR120G-mediated DRM is probably due to the misfolding of alphaBR120G per se and can be delayed or prevented by expression of the wild type alphaB allele or other molecular chaperones, thereby explaining the adult onset of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".