ANALYSIS OF <i>PORPHYRA RBC</i> L DEMONSTRATES MULTIPLE MIGRATIONS OCCURRED BETWEEN THE NORTH ATLANTIC AND NORTH PACIFIC.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The taxonomic and evolutionary relationships between Porphyra of the boreal North Pacific (NP) and North Atlantic (NA) are being examined using near full length sequences of rbc L and the rbc L rbc S spacer (∼1420 bp). Phylogenetic analysis openface> 20 recognized species produced clusters containing both NP and NA species: Porphyra carolinenesis (NA) and Porphyra perforata (NP); Porphyra. leucosticta (NA) and Porphyra fucicola (NP); Porphyra ‘ amplissima ’ (NA) and Porphyra cuneiformis (NP); Porphyra ‘ umbilicalis ’ (NA) and Porphyra mumfordii (NP). A cluster of NP species including Porphyra abbottae , Porphyra kurogii , Porphyra pseudolinearis , and Porphyra pseudolanceolata formed a sister clade to P. fucicola (NP), P. leucosticta (NA) and several cryptic NA taxa. These results demonstrate that a number of “independent” migrations occurred between the North Pacific and Northern Atlantic. Furthermore these results confirm the hypothesis, based on similarities in morphology, isozymes, and karyotype, of Lindstrom & Cole (1992), that several sibling species pairs exist for Porphyra of the boreal North Pacific (NP) and North Atlantic (NA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".