MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130537519 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2009.4959540

New insights into non-causal multichannel linear filtering for noise reduction

2009· article· en· W2130537519 on OpenAlexaff
Mehrez Souden, Jacob Benesty, Sofiène Affes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise reductionDistortion (music)Noise (video)Reduction (mathematics)Noise measurementFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Wiener filterAlgorithmMathematicsParameterized complexitySpeech recognitionSIGNAL (programming language)Gradient noiseValue noiseNoise floorStatisticsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate a general framework for noise reduction which consists in controlling the level of signal distortion while reducing the level of noise. A parameterized non-causal filter that allows for tuning the signal distortion and noise reduction inversely is obtained and is referred to as parameterized multichannel non-causal Wiener filter (PMWF) herein. The same optimization problem leads to the minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) as a particular case of the PMWF. In contrast to earlier works, the proposed expressions of the PMWF and MVDR are simplified and require the knowledge of the speech and noise statistics only. To rigorously quantify the gains and losses when using these filters, we establish simplified closed-form expressions for three measures, namely, the signal distortion index, the noise reduction factor, and the output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and highlight the tradeoff between noise reduction and speech distortion in the multichannel case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207