MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130538196 · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536475

Finite-difference time-domain on the cell/B.E. processor

2008· article· en· W2130538196 on OpenAlexaff
Meilian Xu, Parimala Thulasiraman

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIMDComputer scienceParallel computingPowerPCSpeedupMicroarchitectureSingle-coreMulti-core processorCoprocessorFinite-difference time-domain methodComputationInstruction setComputational scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) is a kernel used to solve problems in electromagnetics applications such as microwave tomography. It is a data-intensive and computation-intensive problem. However, its computation scheme indicates that an architecture with SIMD support has the potential to bring performance improvement over traditional architectures without SIMD support. The Cell Broadband Engine (Cell/B.E.) processor is an implementation of a heterogeneous multicore architecture. It consists of one conventional microprocessor, PowerPC Processor Element (PPE), and eight SIMD co-processor elements, Synergistic Processor Elements (SPEs). One unique feature of an SPE is that it has 128-entry 128-bit uniform registers which support SIMD. Therefore, FDTD may be mapped well on Cell/B.E. processor. However, each SPE can directly access only 256KB local store (LS) both for instructions and data. The size ofLS is much less than what is needed for an accurate simulation of FDTD which requires large number of fine-grained Yee cells. In this paper, we design the algorithm on Cell/B.E. by efficiently using the asynchronous DMA (direct memory access) mechanism available on an SPE transferring data between its LS and the main memory via the high bandwidth bus on-chip EIB (Element Interconnect Bus). The new algorithm was run on an IBM Blade QS20 blades running at 3.2GHz. For a computation domain of 600 x 600 Yee cells, we achieve an overall speedup of 14.14 over AMD Athlon and 7.05 over AMD Opteron at the processor level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing SymposiumSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207