MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130547721 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525813

Planck 2015 resultsVI. LFI mapmaking

2016· article· en· W2130547721 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library (National University of Ireland, Maynooth) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaOffice of ScienceInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationChina Scholarship CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilTekesPartnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBLEuropean Space AgencyMax-Planck-GesellschaftUK Space AgencyScience Foundation IrelandCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsPlanckCovarianceNoise (video)AlgorithmSkyMonte Carlo methodAstrophysicsGalaxyStatisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CSIC, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; ERC, European Research Council; MINECO, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; MPG, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; NASA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration; etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it