MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130559162 · doi:10.5539/mas.v8n4p134

Optimization of Quickly Assembled Steel-Concrete Composite Bridge Used in Temporary

2014· article· en· W2130559162 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Na Lv, Liang Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)DeckStructural engineeringStiffnessComputer scienceArch bridgeGirderCanyonBridge deckArchEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temporary bridge is used to cross river, canyon, ditches and other obstacles duo to its simplicity, convenience for operation and short construction time.How to design the temporary bridge economically and install it quickly are the primary considerations to meet the load requirements and traffic considerations. Based on the structural optimization design theory, the Small Arch Bridge, which is a steel-concrete composite girder bridge and locates in Fu ling district of Chongqing city, is optimized using the linear programming method. In this method, first assume the cross-section of I-girder and the dimensions of deck as the design variables, the mechanical behavior of the whole bridge and the deformation stiffness as the constraints, and then find the minimized cost using MATLAB optimization tools. On the basis of the optimization results, this paper presented the arguments of I-girder and deck panel which meet the mechanical and economical requirements and could provide some references for bridges of like.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207