MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130563893 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2006.888582

Tunable Dielectric Resonator Bandpass Filter With Embedded MEMS Tuning Elements

2007· article· en· W2130563893 on OpenAlexaff
Winter Dong Yan, Raafat R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBand-pass filterResonatorMicroelectromechanical systemsMaterials scienceDielectricCenter frequencyBandwidth (computing)OptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringFilter (signal processing)Prototype filterElectrical engineeringLow-pass filterEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel approach for constructing a tunable dielectric resonator bandpass filter by using the microelectromechanical system (MEMS) technology. The tunability is achieved by unique MEMS tuning elements to perturb the electrical and magnetic fields surrounding the dielectric resonators. The use of such elements as a tuning mechanism results in a wide tuning range at a relatively low tuning voltage and fast tuning speed. A three-pole tunable dielectric resonator bandpass filter is designed, fabricated, and tested. The experimental filter has a center frequency of 15.6 GHz, a 1% relative bandwidth, and an unloaded Q of 1300. A tuning range of 400 MHz is obtained by using MEMS tuning elements with 2 mmtimes2 mm tuning disks. The measured results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed concept

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations112
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207