MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CagA of<i>Helicobacter pylori</i>alters the expression and cellular distribution of host proteins involved in cell signaling

2008· article· en· W2130573633 on OpenAlexafffund
Zaher Zeaiter, Hien Q. Huynh, Richard Kanyo, Markus Stein

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
KeywordsCagAHelicobacter pyloriBiologyVirulenceMicrobiologyMembrane proteinTransmembrane proteinLipid raftCellCell biologySignal transductionBiochemistryReceptorGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To expand our knowledge of Helicobacter pylori virulence mechanisms, we used iTRAQ (isobaric tagging reagents for relative and absolute quantification)-based proteomic analysis to investigate the effect of H. pylori on gastric AGS tissue culture cells. In particular, we were interested in finding out which effects of H. pylori were dependent on the cytotoxins CagA and VacA. Protein analysis was restricted to detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs), because both toxins were described previously to localize in lipid raft-like domains. Using H. pylori wild type and two isogenic mutants, DeltacagA and DeltavacA, we identified a total of 21 proteins that were either increased or decreased in the DRMs due to bacterial infection. The effect on three of these proteins, ezrin, syndecan-4 and Rab11-FIP1, were furthermore dependent on CagA. Because these proteins have been implicated in cell migration, adhesion and polarity, they might act as important mediators of CagA cytotoxicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesFrench-language works237,207