MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130583687 · doi:10.1109/aps.2010.5561172

Compact printed monopole tag antennas for UHF RFID applications

2010· article· en· W2130583687 on OpenAlexaff
A. E. Abdulhadi, Ramesh Abhari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltra high frequencyAntenna (radio)Dipole antennaImpedance matchingMonopole antennaChipDirectional antennaElectrical engineeringComputer sciencePrinted circuit boardElectrical impedanceElectronic engineeringPhysicsAcousticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, three compact printed monopole antennas are designed for use in UHF RFID that contain a chip with input impedance of 8.2-J61Ω. The challenges in the design of these antennas are conjugate matching of the antenna to the chip while achieving a small layout area. Inductive coupling via a printed loop is employed to eliminate the need for a matching circuit with lumped components. For each antenna, the loop area and proximity of it to the radiating body is optimized to obtain a relatively wide band (on the order of 940 MHz, from 530 MHz to 1.47 GHz) matching. Of the three designs, the proposed 3D meander monopole offers the smallest foot print and yields a 70% area reduction in comparison to a folded printed dipole that is commonly used in RFIDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207