MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130618603 · doi:10.5539/ass.v8n10p16

Stress Testing of Commercial Banks’ Exposure to Credit Risk: A Study Based on Write-off Nonperforming Loans

2012· article· en· W2130618603 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lu Wei, Zhiwei Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCredit Risk and Financial Regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNon-performing loanCurrencyStress testEconomicsEconometricsShock (circulatory)Monetary economicsCredit riskBusinessActuarial scienceLoanMacroeconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduced a stress-testing model with a dummy variable that refers to write-off non-performing loans (NPL) by Agricultural Bank of China. A new variable Y that indicated the rate of NPL in major national commercial banks in terms of logit transformation was applied to test stress tolerance. This article built a regression model on the basis of four explanation variables: the growth rate of GDP, indicator of customer price, the growth rate of supplying nominal currency and indicator of house price. Then we took advantages of VAR model to establish the relationship between variables. Based on the model, diverse scenario was set up to conduct stress test to NPL of commercial banks. The test covered four quarters and discovered that lower growth rate of GDP, slump in CPI, slowdown in supply of nominal currency and surging price of house are in charge of short-term increase in non-performing loans. From long-term perspective, the commercial banks would initiate internal system to mitigate the shock from volatile macro factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicCredit Risk and Financial RegulationsFrench-language works237,207