MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130629734 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2008.2009992

Design, Modeling, and Closed-Loop Control of a Complementary Clamp Piezoworm Stage

2009· article· en· W2130629734 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsDoug Bragg Enterprises (Canada)University of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ClampBacklashLoop (graph theory)Tracking (education)Stage (stratigraphy)Controller (irrigation)MillimeterFrame (networking)Computer scienceMicrometerPhysicsMathematicsOpticsControl (management)TelecommunicationsGeologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel complementary clamp piezoworm stage was developed to be integrated into a two-axis configuration for tracking profiles in different size regimes. It is based on novel clamp designs that permit complementary action using the same flexure frame in a compact arrangement. A novel direct connection to a commercial slide was used to eliminate backlash and the need for high-precision alignment of a rod and slide. A model was developed and used to design the controller structure and choose thresholds for smooth operation. Complete assessment of the closed-loop performance of a single-axis and dual-axis stage in different regimes was done. The average positioning accuracy of the stage was plusmn20 nm. For tracking applications, the average error of the two-axis stage was 8 nm in the nanometer regime, 1.72 mum in the micrometer regime, and 1.85 mum in the millimeter regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it