Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this year's session was to explore how the CTSA's 2012 general theme on Sacrament/s and the Global Church could speak more concretely from or to various facets of Asian and/or Asian American Catholic communities.Joseph Cheah's presentation, "White Supremacy and the Sacramentality of Asian American Experience," focused on a few salient points which he has elaborated more completely in his recently published monograph entitled Race and Religion in American Buddhism (Oxford University).Cheah began inquiring about the religious roots of the typical Asian American experience commonly known as the "perpetual foreigner syndrome."He proposed a link with a late Victorian era's ambivalence about Asian religions in the west.For instance, although Buddhism was considered a repository of wisdom, it was at the same time denigrated.Such an attitude could be traced to an entrenched Western superiority complex exemplified even in such renowned scholars as Eugene Burnouf, considered one of the founding fathers of Buddhist Studies in the west.After translating many Buddhist sutras into French, Burnouf had the audacity to claim that he knew the Asian religious tradition better than the Asians themselves.He made the claim based on the Western, Protestant principle that knowledge of a primary text supersedes that of experience.The academic corollary was to style Asian Buddhism as having been corrupted by practitioners who made it accrue nontextual practices and beliefs.Hence, Cheah argues, Buddhism in the west was a carefully constructed entity based largely on a Western superiority complex.Cheah concludes that the sacramentality of Asian/Asian American experiences will remain obscured until Westerners welcome an Asian perspective.The main thrust of Kenan Osborne's presentation, "Euro-American Sacramental Theology-It's Need for Asian Help," was to argued its main point specifically through the concept and value of "interrelationality."This notion contrasts the dominant and traditional Western approach to philosophy and theology in general, as well as to sacramental theology in particular, centered on the notion of essence.The traditional approach is showcased by the Aristotelian, Thomistic language of "form" and "matter," valid performance, and valid reception dominating the Catechism of the Catholic Church's section on sacraments.Osborne juxtaposes the Catechism's language to a typically Asian way of viewing the world founded on the interrelatedness of everyone and everything, a relationality maintaining balance between yin and yang.Osborne argued that if this interrelationality is brought to bear on sacramental theology, a richer view of the sacraments and sacramentality itself emerges, one that is more firmly anchored on life experiences and not limited by the Western myopic focus on essence language and validity.Ultimately, an Asian sacramental approach based on interrelationality illumines the fact that life itself, human relationships, and even the whole cosmos are full of sacraments in that one can be profoundly touched by the divine through them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".