The Case-to-Case Variability of the Predictability of Precipitation by a Storm-Scale Ensemble Forecasting System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper analyzes the case-to-case variability of the predictability of precipitation by a storm-scale ensemble forecasting (SSEF) system. Relationships are sought between ensemble spread and quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) skill, and the characteristics of an event, such as the strength of the quasigeostrophic forcing for ascent, the presence of convective equilibrium, and the spatial extent of the precipitation system. It is found that most of the case-to-case variability of predictability is explained by the spatial coverage of the system. The relationship between convection and large-scale forcing seems to affect predictability mostly during the afternoon hours. While the relationships are weak for the entire dataset, two distinct types of cases are identified: widespread and diurnally forced cases. The loss of predictability at small scales, the effect of the radar data assimilation, and the comparison between forecasts from the SSEF and Lagrangian persistence forecasts are analyzed separately for these two types of cases. Despite overall predictability being better than average for the widespread cases, the loss of predictability with forecast time and spatial scale is just as rapid as for the other cases. For the diurnally forced cases, the radar data assimilation causes larger differences between the precipitation fields corresponding to the assimilating and nonassimilating members than for the widespread cases. However, the effect of radar data assimilation on QPF skill is similar for both types of cases. Also, for the diurnal cases, the models with radar data assimilation outperform very rapidly (after 2 h) the Lagrangian persistence forecasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".