Synthesis and characterization of open‐cell foams for sound absorption with rotational molding method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Foams with open‐cell structures have improved sound absorption abilities over conventional closed‐cell foams. One technique to optimize the acoustic abilities of open‐cell foams is to control their cellular properties through the manipulation of processing parameters. This article presents a novel process to synthesize open‐cell polymeric foams for acoustic applications. The process combined rotational foam molding and particulate leaching to produce foams with open‐cell networks that are desirable for acoustic absorption. Open‐cell foams with open‐porosity of about 0.90 were successfully fabricated with this combined foaming process. Effects of processing parameters on the cellular and acoustic properties of the foam samples were examined and discussed. On the basis of the results from the study, the cellular and acoustic properties of the foam fabricated from the proposed method can be controlled through the use of different salt particle sizes in the process. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it