MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130725714 · doi:10.1186/1532-429x-13-s1-p300

Right ventricle late gadolinium enhancement in cardiac sarcoidosis: a case series

2011· article· en· W2130725714 on OpenAlexaff
Carmen Lydell, Iacopo Carbone, Naeem Merchant

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiac sarcoidosisGadoliniumVentricleMedicineSarcoidosisInternal medicineCardiologySeries (stratigraphy)RadiologyMaterials scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine the prevalence of left and right ventricle late gadolinium enhancement in a series of patients with sarcoidosis and suspected cardiac involvement referred for cardiac MRI. Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by infiltration of tissues by non-caseating granulomas and cardiac disease associated with arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, heart failure and death. Previous case reports have described late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the right ventricle (RV), however, this has been interpreted to be a rare feature of cardiac sarcoidosis. We identified a cases series of patients with sarcoidosis and evaluated the presence of LGE in the RV and LV. Patients referred for cardiac MRI with any notation of “sarcoidosis” between 2007-2010 were identified. Charts were subsequently reviewed to confirm a clinical diagnosis of sarcoidosis based on clinical history and pathology results and characteristic chest CT findings. A total of 47 patients with possible sarcoidosis were identified. Seventeen patients had confirmatory diagnosis of sarcoidosis based on tissue diagnosis or a strong clinical suspicion with characteristic CT chest findings and were included in this case-series. Of the 17 patients, 12 (71%) showed LGE in the LV myocardium and 7 (41%) showed LGE in the RV myocardium. All patients with RV involvement also had LV involvement. Five patients showed no LGE in either the LV or RV. The pattern of RV enhancement was typically transmural. RV involvement in sarcoidosis may be more common than previously appreciated and appears to and coexists with similar findings in the LV. Larger, more rigorous studies are warranted to assess the prevalence of this feature and it’s sensitivity for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceSame topicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207