MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130736153 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450800326

Calculation of solubilities of the pesticides diuron and monuron in organic nonelectrolyte solvents using UNIFAC and modified UNIFAC (dortmund) models

2002· article· en· W2130736153 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. Riverol, Henrik K. Hansen, William E. Acree

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystallization and Solubility Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUNIFACChemistrySolubilityOrganic solventSolventActivity coefficientOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsAqueous solutionChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The solubility of diuron (3‐(3,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐1, 1 ‐dimethyl urea) and monuron (3‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1, 1 ‐dimethyl urea) in 49 and 43 different organic non‐electrolyte solvents, respectively, have been calculated. It was found that Modified UNIFAC described well the solubilities both in polar solvents like alcohols, ketones, esters and ethers and in nonpolar solvents like alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons. UNIFAC and the mobile order theory supplement each other well in calculating the solubilities, which means that one can choose the right model depending on the solvent one is using.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCrystallization and Solubility StudiesFrench-language works237,207