MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W213080541 · doi:10.15173/esr.v10i1.429

Citizen and Consumer Attitudes Towards Electricity Industry Restructuring: An Ontario (Canada) Case-Study

2001· article· en· W213080541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Studies Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy Efficiency and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of WaterlooSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsCITESRestructuringNothingSustainabilityPurchasingNoticeIvory towerBusinessEnvironmental ethicsMarketingPolitical scienceLawEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mark Sagoff has observed that the 'citizen' in him is often in conflict with the 'consumer' in him. Apparently no more schizophrenic than the average North American, Sagoff is simply reflecting upon the apparent contradictions in his life: while he wants sustainability, environmental protection and other lofty societal goals, all too often his purchasing actions do nothing to further these ends. Indeed, he cites the example of the 'Ecology Now' bumper-sticker on his oil-leaking car as a prime example of such tensions in his life (Sagoff, 1988,53).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it