MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130818673 · doi:10.1109/9.855553

Maximum likelihood parameter estimation from incomplete data via the sensitivity equations: the continuous-time case

2000· article· en· W2130818673 on OpenAlexaff
Charalambos D. Charalambous, A. Logothetis

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpectation–maximization algorithmEstimation theoryNonlinear systemSensitivity (control systems)Maximum likelihoodMaximum likelihood sequence estimationMathematicsApplied mathematicsMaximizationMathematical optimizationStochastic approximationComputer scienceAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with maximum likelihood (ML) parameter estimation of continuous-time nonlinear partially observed stochastic systems, via the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. It is shown that the EM algorithm can be executed efficiently, provided the unnormalized conditional density of nonlinear filtering is either explicitly solvable or numerically implemented. The methodology exploits the relationships between incomplete and complete data, log-likelihood and its gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207