Developmental determinants of cardiac sensitivity to hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac sensitivity to oxygen deprivation changes significantly during ontogenetic development. However, the mechanisms for the higher tolerance of the immature heart, possibilities of protection, and the potential impact of perinatal hypoxia on cardiac tolerance to oxygen deprivation in adults have not yet been satisfactorily clarified. The hypoxic tolerance of an isolated rat heart showed a triphasic pattern: significant decrease from postnatal day 1 to 7, followed by increase to the weaning period, and final decline to adulthood. We have observed significant ontogenetic changes in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial membrane potential, as well as in the role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pores in myocardial injury. These results support the hypothesis that cardiac mitochondria are deeply involved in the regulation of cardiac tolerance to oxygen deprivation during ontogenetic development. Ischemic preconditioning failed to increase tolerance to oxygen deprivation in the highly tolerant hearts of newborn rats. Chronic hypoxic exposure during early development may cause in-utero or neonatal programming of several genes that can change the susceptibility of the adult heart to ischemia-reperfusion injury; this effect is sex dependent. These results would have important clinical implications, since cardiac sensitivity in adult patients may be significantly affected by perinatal hypoxia in a sex-dependent manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".