MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130850833 · doi:10.1093/jac/45.6.777

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction to differentiate  -lactamase plasmids of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

2000· article· en· W2130850833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helen Palmer, John P. Leeming, A. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeisseria gonorrhoeaeMultiplex polymerase chain reactionMicrobiologyPolymerase chain reactionPlasmidNeisseriaceaeBiologyVirologyNeisseriaBacteriaAntibioticsGeneticsDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae (PPNG), resistance to penicillin may be mediated by one of several related plasmids of different sizes. These include the Asian, African and Rio/Toronto plasmids. Identification of these plasmids provides useful epidemiological information, but has necessitated plasmid purification and gel analysis. We have developed a rapid, simple multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which discriminates between the beta-lactamase resistance plasmids that are frequently found in strains of N. gonorrhoeae. Amplicons of 1191, 958 and 650 bp were produced from strains containing the African, Asian and Rio/Toronto plasmids, respectively, whilst no products resulted from non-PPNG strains harbouring the cryptic, conjugative or tetracycline resistance plasmids. PCR analysis of 123 strains of PPNG identified 60 strains with African, 16 strains with Asian and 47 strains with Rio/Toronto plasmids and showed complete agreement with the standard plasmid analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207