MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130889164 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2011.2178261

Longitudinal-Partitioning-Based Waveform Relaxation Algorithm for Efficient Analysis of Distributed Transmission-Line Networks

2012· article· en· W2130889164 on OpenAlexaff
Sourajeet Roy, Anestis Dounavis, Amir Beygi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLossless compressionWaveformLossy compressionAlgorithmTransmission lineElectric power transmissionComputer scienceIterative methodCascadeRelaxation (psychology)Parallelizable manifoldTopology (electrical circuits)Line (geometry)Electronic engineeringMathematicsData compressionEngineeringTelecommunicationsGeometryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a waveform relaxation algorithm is presented for efficient transient analysis of large transmission-line networks. The proposed methodology represents lossy transmission lines as a cascade of lumped circuit elements alternating with lossless line segments, where the lossless line segments are modeled using the method of characteristics. Partitioning the transmission lines at the natural interfaces provided by the method of characteristics allows the resulting subcircuits to be weakly coupled by construction. The subcircuits are solved independently using a proposed hybrid iterative technique that combines the advantages of both traditional Gauss-Seidel and Gauss-Jacobi algorithms. The overall algorithm is highly parallelizable and exhibits good scaling with both the size of the network involved and the number of CPUs available. Numerical examples have been presented to illustrate the validity and efficiency of the proposed work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207