In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Recombinant Ebola Viruses Expressing Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To facilitate an understanding of the molecular aspects of the pathogenesis of Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV) infection, we generated 2 different recombinant viruses expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) from additional transcription units inserted at different positions in the virus genome. These viruses showed in vitro phenotypes similar to that of wild-type ZEBOV (wt-ZEBOV) and were stable over multiple passages. Infection with one of the viruses expressing eGFP produced only mild disease in rhesus macaques, demonstrating a marked attenuation in this animal model. However, in mice lacking signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, both viruses expressing eGFP caused lethal cases of disease that were moderately attenuated, compared with that caused by wt-ZEBOV. In mice, viral replication could be easily tracked by the detection of eGFP-positive cells in tissues, by use of flow cytometry. These findings demonstrate that the incorporation of a foreign gene will attenuate ZEBOV in vivo but that these viruses still have potential for in vitro and in vivo research applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it