Influência de diferentes dispositivos de microtração nos valores de resistência coesiva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência de dispositivos de microtração sobre a resistência coesiva de blocos de resina acrílica. Vinte blocos de resina acrílica termopolimerizável (Onda-Cryl Clássico) foram confeccionados e distribuídos em 4 diferentes grupos experimentais (n=5) de acordo com o dispositivo de microtração empregado: G1:Paquímetro modificado; G2: Dispositivo de Andreatta Filho; G3: Dispositivo de Borges; G4: MT-jig. Os blocos foram seccionados em palitos de 1mm2 e submetidos ao teste de microtração (EMIC DL 1000). Os dados foram avaliados pela Análise de Variância e pelo Teste de Tukey, a 5% de significância. Os menores valores de resistência mecânica foram obtidos com os dispositivos de Andreatta Filho (34,22 MPa) e de Borges (34,49 MPa), e os maiores valores com o Paquímetro modificado (49,44 MPa) e o MT-jig (48,40 MPa). Concluiu-se que os valores de resistência mecânica são influenciados pelos dispositivos de microtração utilizados e que não podem ser comparados entre si.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".