MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130929033 · doi:10.1542/neo.11-3-e130

Oxygen and Resuscitation of the Preterm Infant

2010· article· en· W2130929033 on OpenAlex
Yacov Rabi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeoReviews · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineResuscitationOxygen deliveryNeonatal resuscitationOxygen saturationIntensive care medicinePopulationRoom air distributionSupplemental oxygenOxygenAnesthesiaEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of room air for delivery room resuscitation is gaining rapid acceptance. Several studies to date have shown tangible benefits for using room air rather than 100% oxygen, although they are largely limited to asphyxiated term infants. There are several important differences between term and preterm babies in the challenges faced during transition that result largely from differences in pulmonary physiology and antioxidant capabilities. More recently, evidence is emerging about the applicability of room air for resuscitation of the preterm population. These studies demonstrate that the inspired oxygen concentration can be titrated to reach a target oxygen saturation in the delivery room. However, they also raise important questions as to the best concentration of oxygen to use when initiating resuscitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it