A year-long comparison of particle formation events at paired urban and rural locations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrafine particle size distribution data were collected in downtown Toronto and rural Egbert from May 2007 to May 2008. Particle formation events were observed in both locations and contributed to increased concentrations of particles less than 25 nm in diameter. These events were more frequent in spring and fall and rarely occurred in winter. Stronger solar radiation and drier air were correlated with the occurrence of formation events at both locations. Nucleation events occurred simultaneously at both sites on 10% of the days, and these events involved a shared air mass. Half of these simultaneous events were associated with northern air masses and only a quarter with southerly air masses. The higher loading of aged particles in southerly air masses transported from upwind industrial sectors appeared to limit the occurrence of nucleation events. Formation events occurred less frequently in downtown Toronto than at the rural site, and the frequency was lower on weekdays. It is hypothesized that vehicular emissions were responsible for the suppression of nucleation events in downtown Toronto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it