MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130951821 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n7p201

Network Security Policy

2010· article· en· W2130951821 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lihua Han

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork security policyComputer scienceComputer securityNetwork securitySecurity serviceThe InternetOrder (exchange)Cloud computing securitySecurity information and event managementSecurity associationBusinessInformation securityCloud computingWorld Wide WebFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the Internet makes the rapid economy development of the whole society. Many enterprises form their own networks and connect to the Internet, in order to fully realize the sharing and use of data resources. With the development of the network, network security has become a growing concern in all sectors. This paper discusses the status of network security and several major network security technologies, and proposes several measures to realize the network security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicTechnology and Security SystemsFrench-language works237,207