Respiratory System Deposition with a Novel Aerosol Delivery System in Spontaneously Breathing Healthy Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) in children and adults with refractory acute asthma is effective, but therapy may be limited by systemic hypotension that might be avoided with the aerosol route. Inhaled MgSO(4) has a relatively high dose (volume) requirement. This, plus the use of inefficient delivery systems, may explain the lack of efficacy of inhaled MgSO(4) in some studies. An in vitro study suggested that the AeroNeb Go with the Idehaler Pocket and a face mask would deliver 16 mg/min of MgSO(4) to the respiratory system in older children, and approximately a fifth for toddlers, but no in vivo data exist. METHODS: Saline mixed with a radiolabel was used as a proxy for the 100 mg/mL MgSO(4) solution. In 5 adult males the rate of deposition was measured using nuclear medicine techniques. The radiolabel deposition below the vocal cords was converted to the rate of deposition of MgSO(4) and compared to the results from an in vitro model using adult respiratory patterns. RESULTS: The mean ± SD rate of deposition was 12.6 ± 1.9 mg/min. The reasons for this lower deposition, compared to the in vitro estimate, was most likely the exhalation of anatomical dead space aerosol, which would have been captured on the inspiratory filter in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: These in vivo data confirm the deposition data predicted in the in vitro study, although caution should be used in extrapolating the results to children. This device appears suitable for the clinical trial of inhaled MgSO(4) in children and adults with refractory asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".