MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130962385 · doi:10.1051/jp4:20030265

Arctic mercury depletion events at two elevations as observed at the Zeppelin Station and Dirigibile Italia, Ny-Ålesund, spring 2002

2003· article· en· W2130962385 on OpenAlexaff
Torunn Berg, Jonas Sommar, Wängberg, Katarina Gårdfeldt, John Munthe, Bill Schroeder

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowMercury (programming language)Atmospheric sciencesArcticEnvironmental scienceAltitude (triangle)Environmental chemistryThe arcticAtmosphere (unit)Spring (device)MeteorologyChemistryGeologyOceanographyGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speciation of mercury in the atmosphere (GEM, RGM) and snow (Hg-tot) has been carried out at two altitudes (474 and 12 m a.s.l.) at Ny-Alesund, Spitzbergen. The concentration of GEM was in the range <0.1 to 2.2 ng m -3 during the campaign. At the lower altitude, the GEM concentration was generally highest and showed a higher variability. RGM and total mercury in snow were anti-correlated with GEM. RGM sampled without teflon grid exhibited higher concentrations than those collected with filter, using manual denuders. Additionally, evidence for photo-induced emissions of Hg 0 from the surface snow was obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings)Same topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207