MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131004306 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2005.862174

A connectivity based clustering algorithm with application to VLSI circuit partitioning

2006· article· en· W2131004306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisVery-large-scale integrationComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)AlgorithmSuiteSet (abstract data type)Parallel computingData miningArtificial intelligenceEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circuit partitioning is a fundamental problem in very large-scale integration (VLSI) physical design automation. In this brief, we present a new connectivity-based clustering algorithm for VLSI circuit partitioning. The proposed clustering method focuses on capturing natural clusters in a circuit, i.e., the groups of cells that are highly interconnected in a circuit. Therefore, the proposed clustering method can reduce the size of large-scale partitioning problems without losing partitioning solution qualities. The performance of the proposed clustering algorithm is evaluated on a standard set of partitioning benchmarks-ISPD98 benchmark suite. The experimental results show that by applying the proposed clustering algorithm, the previously reported best partitioning solutions from state-of-the-art partitioners are further improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it