MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131032148 · doi:10.2307/3315950

Highs and lows: Some properties of the extremes of a diffusion and applications in finance

2002· article· en· W2131032148 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Donald L. Mcleish

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsActuaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVolatility (finance)Geometric Brownian motionEconomicsEconometricsCurrencyBrownian motionFinancial economicsDiffusionStochastic volatilityImplied volatilityDiffusion processMonetary economicsMathematicsStatisticsEconomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Observations on security prices, currency exchange rates, interest rates, and other financial time series usually include not only an open and close, but also a high and low price for the period. For Brown‐ian motion and certain diffusion processes, the information on high and low prices is of considerable value, particularly for estimating volatility, correlations between processes, and in the pricing of look‐back and barrier options. For pricing more general derivatives, this information is useful to the extent that change in volatility is an important ingredient in the price. The author gives a simple geometric device for generating the extremes of Brownian motion, and geometric Brownian motion; he then uses these extremes in the estimation of the volatility of the processes and to study survivorship bias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207