Development Inter-budgetary Fiscal Relations on the Basis of the Model of Subnational Budgets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the work is to develop the tools of mechanism of functioning of inter-budgetary fiscal relations on the basis of the model of subnational budgets. In accordance with the aim of the research, the algorithm of analysis of efficiency of implementation of the budgetary development program is offered, multiple-choice regional model of budgetary resources management is developed in the article. In spite of the great number of works devoted to the problems of regional regulation of inter-budgetary and social-economic processes, a lot of questions of their practical implementation, including questions of optimization of expenditures of budgetary funds, are still insufficiently developed. It determined the purpose and objectives of the study. In work the model of concentration of budgetary resources in order to increase the number of subjects of taxation is implemented at the expense of increase of number of employees of manufacturing sphere with the current level of wages and at the expense of investment support of development of small and medium-size business.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".