MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131049857 · doi:10.1109/tbc.2012.2199598

Cloud Transmission: A New Spectrum-Reuse Friendly Digital Terrestrial Broadcasting Transmission System

2012· article· en· W2131049857 on OpenAlexaff
Yiyan Wu, Bo Rong, Khalil Salehian, Gilles Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDigital terrestrial televisionSingle-frequency networkRobustness (evolution)Cloud computingMultipath propagationComputer networkScalabilityTransmission (telecommunications)Digital televisionReuseTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a new transmission system—“Cloud Transmission (Cloud Txn)” for terrestrial broadcasting or point-to-multipoint multimedia services. The system is based on the concept of increasing the reception robustness, and using the spectrum more efficiently. As such, the system is designed to be robust to co-channel interference, immune to multipath distortion, and is highly spectrum reuse friendly. It can increase the spectrum utilization significantly (3 to 4 times) by making all terrestrial RF channels in a city/market available for broadcast service. The system has the robustness required for providing mobile, pedestrian and indoor reception. It can be used for both small and large cell applications. The receiver is simple and energy efficient. The proposed system is scalable and can be implemented progressively, i.e., providing an easy transition from the traditional systems to the new Cloud Txn system. It can also coexist with the existing DTV systems and their newer versions, such as DVB-T2 or Super Hi-Vision systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations373
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on BroadcastingSame topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207