Protein Composition of the Ventral Processes on the Sperm Head of Australian Hydromyine Rodents1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sperm head of the plains rat, an Australian hydromyine rodent, is highly complex in structure and contains, in addition to an apical hook, two large ventral processes (VPs) that extend from its upper concave surface and that are largely composed of a huge extension of the sperm head cytoskeleton surrounded by postacrosomal dense lamina. In this study we have attempted to determine their protein composition. For this, the VPs were isolated, the proteins within them separated by SDS-PAGE, and the resultant polypeptide bands Western blotted and probed with antibodies against laboratory rat perforatorial and bull perinuclear theca sperm proteins. Antibodies were also used to determine the perforatorial and perinuclear theca proteins by immunogold labeling of transmission electron microscopic sections. The results indicate that the material within the VPs is largely composed of perforatorial cross-reacting proteins together with F-actin with the dominant protein being PERF 15. The perinuclear theca proteins are, by contrast, restricted to a narrow region adjacent to the acrosomal and nuclear membranes. In conclusion, this study has shown that the VPs of the spermatozoa of Australian rodents are perforatorial-like appendages that contain similar proteins to the perforatorium of the apical hook together with F-actin; their functional significance remains unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".