Practical limitations of subwavelength resolution using negative-refractive-index transmission-line lenses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we have demonstrated both analytically and experimentally subwavelength imaging using a negative-refractive-index lens made of a periodically L, C loaded transmission line (TL) network. This loaded transmission line network has been referred to as the dual TL lens. Here, we consider the limitations on subwavelength imaging imposed by impedance mismatches and the component losses of a practical dual TL lens. Simple expressions for estimating the resolving capability of a dual TL lens are given. It is found that the resolution enhancement of the dual lens is proportional to the quality factor of the series loading capacitors divided by the electrical thickness of the lens. The effective material parameters of the dual TL lens are also derived so that these expressions can be directly related to those of previous studies considering uniform and isotropic left-handed lenses. Finally, the resolving capability of an experimental lens that achieves subwavelength imaging is theoretically predicted. These theoretical predictions are then directly compared to previously reported experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it