MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131152938 · doi:10.1109/icig.2007.129

A New Image Scaling Algorithm Based on the Sampling Theorem of Papoulis and Application to Color Images

2007· article· en· W2131152938 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAliasingScalingImage scalingMathematicsAlgorithmSampling (signal processing)Image (mathematics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceClassification of discontinuitiesNyquist–Shannon sampling theoremCurvatureComputer visionImage processingFilter (signal processing)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present in this paper a new image scaling algorithm which is based on the generalized sampling theorem of Papoulis. The main idea consists in using the first and second derivatives of an image in the scaling process. The derivatives contain information about edges and discontinuities that should be preserved during resizing. The sampling theorem of Papoulis is used to combine this information. We compare our algorithm with nine of the most common scaling algorithms and two measures of quality are used: the standard deviation for evaluation of the blur, and the curvature for evaluation of the aliasing. The results presented here show that our algorithm gives the best images with very few aliasing, good contrast, good edge preserving and few blur. We also present how our algorithm applies to color images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207