MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131232619 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66344-6

PREDICTORS OF PATIENT RESPONSE TO ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY FOR THE CHRONIC PROSTATITIS/CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN SYNDROME: A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER CLINICAL TRIAL

2001· article· en· W2131232619 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstatitisPelvic painInternal medicineInterstitial cystitisChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndromeUrinary systemChronic bacterial prostatitisProstateUrologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To our knowledge antibiotics are the most popular choice of therapy for all categories of the chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. We determine if culture, leukocyte and/or antibody status of prostate specific specimens predicts patient response to antibiotic therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients clinically diagnosed with the chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) definition had a lower urinary tract evaluation that included standard microscopy and culture of prostate specific specimens, and determination of the ratio of voided bladder 3 and voided bladder 2 antibody levels against a panel of identified prostate pathogens (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay methodology). Symptom evaluation consisted of the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (derived) pain scale 0 to 21, symptom severity index scale 0 to 100, symptom frequency questionnaire scale 0 to 50 and quality of life scale 0 to 6. Patients were stratified according to microscopy, culture and immune status, were treated with 12 weeks of ofloxacin, and were assessed at 4, 12 and 24 weeks with symptom scores as well as global assessments. RESULTS: Based on leukocyte and culture results, 102 evaluable patients were stratified into categories II (14%), IIIA (48%) and IIIB (38%) of the chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Of the cases 23% were categorized as antibody positive and 77% as antibody negative. Average age was 42 +/- 10 years and 92% of patients were white. Of the patients 57% believed that they had moderate to marked improvement. All categories of the chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and patients in whom antibody was positive or negative had significant improvement in the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index, symptom severity index, symptom frequency questionnaire and quality of life scores compared with baseline (p <0.001). There was no significant difference in patient response to the stratification based on culture, leukocyte, that is categories II, IIIA and IIIB had same beneficial response, or antibody status. CONCLUSIONS: Culture, leukocyte and antibody status of prostate specific specimens does not predict antibiotic response in patients with the chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. The perceived beneficial effect of antibiotics needs to be evaluated in a randomized placebo controlled trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it