Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article draws a profile of the last 25 years and frames within the general history of the world and of Italy the contributions that have been collected in this volume dedicated to 25 years of work of l'industria, which are also 25 years of problems of industrial economics, both in the world and in Italy. The outlined profile is divided into two parts, the first devoted to the main features of the world history of the last 25 years and the second devoted to Italy in the same period, in brief. According to the author, from an economic point of view this last quarter of the century XX, that follows the previous quarter of the century called golden is actually dominated by the problem of unequal development of research, technology and production on one side, extraordinarily in expansion in all fields, and the energetic sector on the other side, basically blocked at the resource The author suggests that also in these 25 years the main problems may be reconducted to the geopolitics of oil. Oil age, therefore? Considering that the readers would find this label too materialistic, the author accepts to define the last quarter of the century as the age, as it is common to do nowadays. But he tries to demonstrate that the main critical problems of globalisation bring us, eventually, to that dramatic limit to the growth of the world economy that is the stasis of energetic technologies and to the geopolitics problems that derive from it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it