MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131258646 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2008.24

Low Autocorrelation Fractional PTS Subblocking for PAPR Reduction in OFDM Systems

2008· article· en· W2131258646 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ghassemi, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingAutocorrelationFast Fourier transformReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmComputational complexity theoryInverseMathematicsDiscrete Fourier transform (general)ComputationAutocorrelation matrixComputer scienceFourier transformFractional Fourier transformTelecommunicationsStatisticsFourier analysisChannel (broadcasting)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial transmit sequence (PTS) is a distortionless technique used to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal. However, PTS has a relatively high computational complexity due to the computation of multiple inverse fast Fourier transforms (IFFTs). To reduce this complexity, fractional subblocking was introduced where a subset of inputs to identical inverse discrete Fourier transforms (IDFTs) (within an N-point IFFT) were used for subblocking. Unfortunately, the PAPR performance is degraded as the number of identical DFTs is increased. In this paper, we exploit the periodic autocorrelation function (ACF) of the PTS sequences to improve the PAPR performance with fractional subblocks. We show that a PAPR reduction is achieved which is better than with pseudo-random subblocking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207