MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131327528 · doi:10.2118/117109-ms

Real-Time Drill Bit Wear Prediction by Combining Rock Energy and Drilling Strength Concepts

2008· article· en· W2131327528 on OpenAlexaff
B. Rashidi, G. Hareland, Runar Nygaard

Bibliographic record

VenueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRate of penetrationDrillingDrill bitPenetration ratePetroleum engineeringBit (key)Specific energyDrillMeasurement while drillingDrilling engineeringOffshore drillingDrilling fluidPenetration depthOil fieldComputer scienceMechanical engineeringGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A central element to reduce drilling cost is to improve drilling operation by analyzing real-time data. Developing advanced real-time analysis tools is one way to improve the drilling operation. Two approaches which currently are used for optimizing the actual rotary drilling process are mechanical specific energy and inverted rate of penetration models. The mechanical specific energy method is defined as the work needed to destroy a given volume of the rock. It can act as a tool during the drilling operation to detect changes in drilling efficiency thus providing a method to optimize the drilling parameters to enhance instatanious rate of penetration. Rate of penetration models, on the other hand, can be used to calculate formation drillability considering the effects of drilling parameters, bits design and bit wear. Drilling optimization using rate of penetration models is done by changing the drilling parameters and/or bit design to find the optimum drilling scenario for an entire bit run. The mechanical specific energy log and the drillability ratio differ when mud weight is changed and when bits are worn. These two differences are due the fact that mechanical specific energy does not include bit wear as well as the effect of changing mud weight. By combining these methods and modifying the mechanical specific energy equations to incorporate these effects and the mechanical specific energy can be used as a real-time trending tool for bit wear estimations. In this analysis, wells from offshore Middle East and onshore North America are analyzed. The field results are very encouraging in that the bit wear for both roller cone and PDC bits can be predicted. The field validation of this new approach shows that the supplementary information on the bit wear status can in some cases benefit in the decision of when to pull the bit while it still is in the hole and thereby possibly improve overall economics of the drilling operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and ConferenceSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207