MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131347444 · doi:10.1142/s0217984910023542

NUMERIAL INVESTIGATION OF THERMODIFFUSION EFFECTS ON PEM FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE

2010· article· en· W2131347444 on OpenAlexaff
Rihab Jaralla, Jun Cao, M. Ziad Saghir

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellWork (physics)Nonlinear systemFinite element methodMomentum (technical analysis)MechanicsMass transportFuel cellsMaterials scienceSet (abstract data type)Nuclear engineeringComputer scienceThermodynamicsPhysicsBiochemical engineeringChemical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An increasing amount of attention has been paid on the study of thermodiffusion effects on mass transport. This paper presents a novel mathematical model for an entire proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) with focus placed on the modeling and assessment of the role of thermodiffusion that has been usually neglected in previous fuel cell research work. Built upon the equations of continuity, momentum, energy, species concentrations, and electric potentials in different regions of a PEMFC, a set of nonlinear partial differential equations are numerically solved using finite element methods. The simulation results demonstrate that the thermodiffusion has a noticeable impact on transport of species in an operational PEMFC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Physics Letters BSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207