Bibliographic record
Abstract
Du fait de l’accessibilité de l’expérience cinématographique, la sociologie du cinéma offre un observatoire privilégié des contraintes de justification qui pèsent sur la production d’un discours sociologique sur l’art, à travers l’effort de justification intellectuelle exigible du chercheur qui s’implique personnellement dans un loisir artistique qui est en même temps un divertissement de masse. L’article examine des textes de référence de la littérature sociologique française sur le cinéma, de l’étude pionnière d’Edgar Morin sur Les Stars au livre de Pierre Sorlin, Sociologie du cinéma, en passant par La Distinction de Pierre Bourdieu. Il analyse la construction par le sociologue d’une position d’expertise par rapport au cinéma et la contribution du discours sociologique, par l’intermédiaire du succès remporté par ces publications, à la valorisation en France d’une vision élitiste du plaisir cinématographique et de la cinéphilie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".