MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131410974 · doi:10.1111/nzg.12041_6

Honorary Life Membership Award: Emeritus <scp>P</scp>rofessor <scp>P</scp>eter <scp>H</scp>olland (<scp>U</scp>niversity of <scp>O</scp>tago)

2014· article· en· W2131410974 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tony Binns, Etienne Nel

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Geographer · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNew Zealand Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographerSupporterScholarshipLibrary scienceCitationSociologyManagementEnvironmental ethicsHistoryGeographyPolitical scienceLawGenealogyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation In 2008, the NZGS presented Peter with its most prestigious award, that of Distinguished New Zealand Geographer. Over a long and distinguished career, Peter has published five books and some 64 journal articles and book chapters, and since 1983 he has supervised 58 masters and PhD theses. His primary research focus has been on the biogeography, ecology and environmental history of New Zealand, and in this regard he has made a sustained and significant contribution to New Zealand scholarship for several decades. He has also researched and published on these themes in Kenya, Canada and South Africa. Peter's services to the broader academic environment in New Zealand include membership of NZQA panels, serving on and leading numerous academic audits, and broad participation in an advisory capacity in a range of academic activities. In addition, he has been an active member and supporter of numerous community-based activities. Peter Holland received the title of Honorary Life Member (Fellow) in recognition of his very considerable contributions to the NZGS and to Geography in New Zealand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2260.130

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand GeographerSame topicNew Zealand Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207