MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131423855 · doi:10.22230/cjc.2007v32n1a1861

Teaching Communication Policy: Pedagogy in Brief

2007· article· en· W2131423855 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Philip Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersIndustry CanadaRoyal SocietyYork UniversityMcMaster University
KeywordsSession (web analytics)Round tableReading (process)Media studiesSociologyTable (database)Key (lock)Political sciencePedagogyLibrary scienceLawAdvertisingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article summarizes a Canadian Communication Association round table session in June 2006 that brought together some of Canada’s leading instructors of communication policy: Paul Audley (Schulich School of Business, York University), Pierre Bélanger (Department of Communication, University of Ottawa), Vanda Rideout (Department of Sociology, University of New Brunswick), Liora Salter (Osgoode Hall Law School, York University), and David Skinner (Communication Studies, York University). The participants in the session provided insight around six key issues in teaching policy: 1) Challenges, 2) Definitions, 3) Making It Contemporary, 4) Including History, 5) Including a Future, and 6) Reading, Writing, and Role-Play.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CommunicationSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207