MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131475384 · doi:10.1039/c2nr30500c

Local structure of fluorescent platinum nanoclusters

2012· article· en· W2131475384 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceSimon Fraser UniversityKillam TrustsU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNanoclustersPlatinumFluorescenceMaterials scienceMetalCharacterization (materials science)Local structureNanotechnologyNoble metalSpectroscopyDimethylformamidePhotochemistryChemical physicsChemistryOrganic chemistryMetallurgyOpticsPhysicsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluorescent nanoclusters synthesized from a variety of noble metals have recently been reported in the scientific literature. Various characterization methods have been employed in their study, but uncertainty still remains regarding the local structure of such materials. Herein we present the results of employing X-ray absorption spectroscopy to probe the local structure and electronic properties of platinum nanoclusters reduced and stabilized using N,N-dimethylformamide. Most notable amongst these results is an apparent lack of metallic bonding in the samples studied; in light of these findings, it is proposed that a non-metallic platinum nanocluster is instead responsible for the observed fluorescence behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it