MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131491700 · doi:10.1177/1060028014546184

Rapid Resolution of Tacrolimus Intoxication–Induced AKI With a Corticosteroid and Phenytoin

2014· article· en· W2131491700 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Bax, Janice A. Tijssen, Michael Rieder, Guido Filler

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Pharmacotherapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTacrolimusMedicinePhenytoinPhenobarbitalCorticosteroidPharmacologyAnesthesiaGastroenterologyInternal medicineEpilepsyTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To report a novel approach to the management of tacrolimus intoxication that leads to rapid normalization of serum tacrolimus concentrations. CASE SUMMARY: A 9-year-old female renal transplant recipient developed a severe tacrolimus intoxication as a result of prolonged diarrhea, which resulted in acute kidney injury, severe dehydration, and neurological symptoms. We used a combination of intravenous steroids and intravenous phenytoin to normalize the tacrolimus level from 32 to 5 ng/mL in less than 24 hours, with complete resolution of symptoms and signs. DISCUSSION: Tacrolimus intoxication is a rare event but may result in life-threatening complications. Treatment recommendations beyond holding the drug and enzyme induction with phenytoin or phenobarbital are elusive. This approach leads to a relatively slow normalization of the tacrolimus level over 72 hours. The authors hypothesized that additional induction of the p-glycoprotein through steroids was synergistic. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of phenytoin and a corticosteroid may be an effective approach that leads to rapid normalization of severely elevated tacrolimus levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of PharmacotherapySame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207